The first part of this piece made the case that the 2015 Veale et al. meta-analysis is the most rigorous data set available on penile size. That remains true. Rigorous, however, is not the same as complete. And "most cited" is not the same as "universally applicable."

There are very few conversations in men's health that generate more noise and less signal than the one about size. Forums, locker rooms, adult entertainment, and the comment sections of dubious "enhancement" websites have been polluting the data pool for decades.